A Prospective Cohort Study Analyzing Radiation-Induced Xerostomia and Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy Techniques at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Eastern India.

Introduction Cancer of the head and neck is one of the most common cancers in India. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a vital role in the management of head and neck cancer both as a curative and adjuvant modality. Xerostomia is the most common acute and late toxicity. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze radiation-induced xerostomia and the quality of life of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Objectives We aim to evaluate radiation-induced acute xerostomia both subjectively and objectively at three-month and one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up period in patients who received radiotherapy in conformal technique (IMRT) to the head and neck region and compare it with those who received the 3DCRT technique. We also aim to assess the recovery of salivary flow in the third month post-radiotherapy by measuring the parotid scintigraphy excretion fraction. Materials and methods Forty patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were randomly assigned to the IMRT and 3DCRT arms. Xerostomia during radiation and at three-month and one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up was assessed subjectively using the xerostomia-related quality of life (XeQOL) questionnaire and objectively by measuring the salivary flow rate and parotid scintigraphy. Results The result is analyzed using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. The analysis showed that patients treated with radiation by IMRT showed better XeQOL scores (43.40±2.326 in IMRT and 52.10±2.573 in 3DCRT, p<0.001) and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) score (27.65±2.796 in IMRT and 33.80±1.936 in 3DCRT, p<0.001) compared to those treated with 3DCRT. Analysis of the excretion fraction (EF%) of parotid scintigraphy depicted improvement in EF% for both right and left parotids in the IMRT arm with statistical significance (for right parotid, 25.22±12.98 in IMRT and 19.60±10.17 in 3DCRT, p=0.136, and for left parotid, 28.03±12.51 in IMRT and 15.35±11.49 in 3DCRT, p=0.0019). The mean rate of flow (ROF) of saliva showed a declining trend during the end of radiotherapy treatment compared to baseline, but the mean ROF of saliva was better in IMRT compared to 3DCRT, and the difference was statistically significant. The ROF of saliva starts improving during the one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up period. Pearson's chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between mean parotid dose with EF% of parotid scintigraphy, and it showed a negative correlation, which is statistically significant for both 3DCRT and IMRT arms. Conclusion Xerostomia can be reduced by precision radiotherapies such as the parotid-sparing IMRT technique in head and neck cancer patients, hence improving the quality of life.

Current status and future readiness of Indian radiation oncologists to embrace prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy: An Indian Brachytherapy Society survey.

Purpose: This survey aimed to understand the practice pattern and attitude of Indian doctors towards prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods: A 21-point questionnaire was designed in Google form and sent to radiation oncologists practicing in India, using texts, mails, and social media. Responses were collated, and descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 212 radiation oncologists from 136 centers responded to the survey questionnaire, with majority (66%) being post-specialty training > 6 years. We found that about 44.3% (n = 94) of respondents do not practice interstitial brachytherapy for any site, and majority (83.3%, n = 175) do not practice high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy. Only 2.8% (n = 6) of doctors preferred boost by brachytherapy compared with 38.1% (n = 80) of respondents, who favored stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost. When asked about the indication of HDR prostate brachytherapy in Indian setting, 32.5% (n = 67) of respondents favored monotherapy, 46.1% (n = 95) of oncologists thought boost as a good indication, and 21.4% (n = 44) preferred re-irradiation/salvage setting. The most cited reason for prostate brachytherapy not being popularly practiced in India was lack of training (84.8%, n = 179). It was also noted that out of 80 respondents who practiced SBRT for prostate boost, 37 would prefer HDR brachytherapy boost if given adequate training and facilities. Conclusions: The present survey provided insight on practice of prostate brachytherapy in India. It is evident that majority of radiation oncologists do not practice HDR prostate brachytherapy due to lack of training and infrastructure. Indian physicians are willing to learn and start prostate brachytherapy procedures if dedicated training and workshops are organized.

Daily waiting time management for modern radiation oncology department in Indian perspective.

Introduction: Radiation therapy is one of the most technically sophisticated branch of medical sciences which caters to very ill patients, some of whom may be terminally ill. Since patients are treated on an outpatient basis which requires daily visit to hospital for a number of days, it can make them sensitive toward any increase in waiting time for their radiation treatment. This could be a source of stress for them. However, given the technical sophistication involved and varied clinical profile of patients, some amount of delay is inevitable. Aim & Objective: To compile and suggest strategies to manage patient waiting time in Radiation oncology department to achieve optimum patient' satisfaction. Method: The radiation oncologists in different institutes of the country were interviewed telephonically and were asked about the practices followed in their institutes/ departments in managing the patient waiting time during radiation treatment. The best practices being followed and the suggestions were compiled. Conclusion: Now it is being recognized that meticulous management of waiting time could go a long way in driving patient's satisfaction. Twoway communications are the best strategy. Apart from this many provisions could be made in waiting area as per institutional preferences and protocol to engage patient in waiting area of radiation treatment facility.

Unusual Case of Metastatic Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma and Emphasis on Role of 68Ga-PSMA PET in Imaging.

We present a 53 year old woman initially diagnosed as hemangiopericytoma in the posterior fossa on the right side post excision with immunohistochemistry staining for CD34 being positive. Presently, the patient had difficulty in walking due to back pain and pain in left arm. Imaging with F-FDG PET showed low glucose avidity in disease sites but Ga-PSMA PET unequivocally demonstrated multiple skeletal and liver metastases with intense PSMA avidity. Patient received palliative radiotherapy to bone metastasis and was planned for chemotherapy. This report adds to the list of applications of Ga PSMA PET and a possible theranostic target.

Role of radiation therapy for renal tumors.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an aggressive malignancy that carries a poor prognosis, especially in patients presenting with advanced stage. Primary treatment for localized RCC is surgical resection however, a significant number of patients still develop locoregional and distant metastasis after curative resection. In metastatic disease, radiation therapy (RT) has been used for palliation routinely for brain and other extracranial lesions with respectable response rates. However, RT for primary RCC has questionable benefit. In this article, the authors discuss the evidence with regards to the role of RT in primary RCC either as a primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, or preoperatively to improve resection outcomes. In addition, novel RT techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and its use in RCC management are also addressed. Finally, the authors discuss the techniques and doses of RT for primary RCC.